U.s. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments

Informações:

Synopsis

A case which the Court dismissed regarding whether or not the three-year statute of limitations set forth in the Securities Act of 1933 is suspended when a class-action lawsuit is filed.

Episodes

  • Highmark v. Allcare Management Systems

    26/02/2014

    A case in which the Court held that a district court is the best place to determine whether or not a lawsuit is objectively baseless.

  • Octane Fitness v. ICON Health & Fitness

    26/02/2014

    A case in which the Court defined "exceptional" cases as ones that simply stand out from others due to a frivolous nature related to its legal claims.

  • Robers v. United States

    25/02/2014

    A case in which the Court held that, under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, individuals accused of property crime must pay “an amount equal to...the value of the property,” minus “the value...of any part of the property that is returned" in retribution.

  • Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA

    24/02/2014

    A case in which the Court held that, under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is not required to include greenhouse gas emissions every time it mentions air pollution.

  • Abramski v. United States

    22/01/2014

    A case in which the Court held that a firearm purchaser's intent to sell their gun to another buyer is necessary information for the seller's records.

  • Paroline v. United States

    22/01/2014

    A case in which the Court ruled that to recover restitution, either the government or the victim must establish a causal relationship between the defendant's conduct and the victim's harm or damages.

  • Petrella v. MGM, Inc.

    21/01/2014

    A case in which the Court held that the doctrine of laches could not be used to prevent a copyright suit that seeks relief for damages that occurred within the three-year window allowed by the Copyright Act.

  • Prado Navarette v. California

    21/01/2014

    A case in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment does not require an officer who received information regarding drunken or reckless driving to independently corroborate the behavior before stopping the vehicle.

  • Harris v. Quinn

    21/01/2014

    A case in which the Court held that the the First Amendment prohibits the collection of union dues from home health care providers who do not wish to join a union.

  • McCullen v. Coakley

    15/01/2014

    A case in which the Court ruled that the Massachusetts legislature violated the freedom of speech protections of the First Amendment when it created a 35-foot buffer around the entrances, exits and driveways of abortion clinics where political activity was prohibited.

  • United States v. Castleman

    15/01/2014

    A case in which the Court held that a Tennessee man's conviction of domestic violence under state law also prevented him from legally possessing firearms under federal law.

  • United States v. Quality Stores

    14/01/2014

    A case in which the Court found that severance payments made to employees who were unwillingly laid off are taxable under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act.

  • Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States

    14/01/2014

    A case in which the Court held that the General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875 guaranteed the federal government easements for federally-granted railroad land, but not an enduring property interest.

  • Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison

    14/01/2014

    A case in which the Court found that a bankruptcy judge may hear arguments and file a report with a district court for "non-core" bankruptcy issues.

  • Law v. Siegel

    13/01/2014

    A case in which the Court found that a bankruptcy court may not enforce specific statutory exceptions.

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning

    13/01/2014

    A case in which the Court further defined the limitations on the presidential powers granted by the Recess Appointments Clause.

  • White v. Woodall

    11/12/2013

    A case in which the Court held that a guilty plea negates a person's rights against self-incrimination in court.

  • Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez

    11/12/2013

    A case in which the Court held that the policy of equitable tolling does not apply to the statute of limitations outlined in the Hauge Convention's provision on international child abduction.

  • Environmental Protection Agency v. EME Homer City Generation

    10/12/2013

    A case in which the Court held that the EPA has an absolute mandate to require states to meet federal standards set forth in the Clean Air Act.

  • Scialabba v. Cuellar De Osorio

    10/12/2013

    A case in which the Court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not allow children who have submitted an application for a visa to keep their original application date if they "aged out" before it was processed.

page 2 from 4